Legal Opinion
LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1984No. C4-84-88PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
We granted review of the determination of the Commissioner of Economic Security that respondents Lucille and Diane Seline were employees of relator and thus eligible for unemployment compensation upon their termination. We affirm.
FACTS
Relator, LeGrand Supper Club, serves food and beverages to the general public. Its facilities are cleaned on a daily basis. In October of 1981, the Club accepted cleaning bids from independent contractors. Respondent Lucille Seline was engaged at that time. She performed cleaning services for relator from October, 1981 to January,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Guhlke v. Roberts Truck LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hammes v. SukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wise v. Denesen Insulation Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Andrade v. EllefsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Carey v. Coty ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Moore Associates, LLC v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Martin Homes, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.