Legal Opinion

Carey v. Coty Construction

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 2, 1986No. C8-86-664PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Following a determination by a claims deputy that relator Brad Carey was an independent contractor, Carey appealed to a department referee. The referee reversed the claims deputy, finding that Carey was an employee of Coty Construction. Coty, in turn, appealed to a Commissioner’s representative, who reversed the referee and held that Carey was an independent contractor. Carey has appealed to this court by writ of certiorari. We affirm.

FACTS

In the summer of 1980, Brad Carey and Patrick Coty began roofing together under the name of C & C Construction. When the 1980 roofing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guhlke v. Roberts Truck LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Darvell v. Paul A. Laurence Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Wise v. Denesen Insulation Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. LeGrand Supper Club v. SelineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neve v. Austin Daily HeraldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Neve v. Austin Daily HeraldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Peggy Adegeye v. BB Home Healthcare, Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API