In the Interest of Stevenson
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
On its own motion, the panel withdraws its original opinion and judgment dated March 8, 2000. This opinion and judgment are substituted. The opinion is revised to clarify that if parental termination is sought under section 161.001(l)(D)of the Texas Family Code, the trial court must instinct the jury that it must find by clear and convincing evidence that the parent knew the child was his when he engaged in the conduct proscribed by section 161.001(1)(D). However, if parental termination is sought under section 161.001(1)(E), the trial court is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Texas Department of Human Services v. HindsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- In the Interest of M.D.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Dallas Market Center Development Co. v. LiedekerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Alaniz v. Jones & Neuse, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- in the Interest of S.F., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- In the Interest of M.J.M.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- in the Interest of D.M.F., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- Coley v. Baylor University, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
- In the Interest of S.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.