Legal Opinion
In the Interest of M.D.S.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 29, 1999No. 07-98-0149-CVPublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHIL JOHNSON, Justice.
David Perez, Candace Seedig, and Connie Samples, appellants, appeal from two orders in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. M.D.S. is the child who is the subject of the suit. The first order terminated the parental rights of Seedig pursuant to a voluntary affidavit of relin*194quishment. The second order granted an involuntary termination of the parental rights of Perez, denied grandparent access to Samples, and granted an adoption of M.D.S. to Norma Jan and W. David Wor-rall, appellees. Appellants assert that (1) the trial court erred in failing to appoint a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- In the Interest of D.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- In the Interest of J.I.T.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- In the Interest of M.J.M.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- In Re Doe 2Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- In the Interest of Caballero, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.