Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shutt v. Shutt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 22, 1922No. 24335PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtProvosts', C. J.

The father and mother of defendant are relators in this habeas corpus proceeding, the object of which is to recover possession of defendant’s 8- year old son. They allege that the child was given to them permanently by defendant in infancy, and that he has remained with them ever since; < that 13 days before the filing of this suit defendant secured possession of the child on the pretense of desiring to buy him *219some clothes; that defendant and the mother of the child have been divorced, and that defendant recently remarried, and is not in a position to give the child proper care.

Two days…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte LincolnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Lasserre v. MichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Heitkamp v. RaganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Kearney v. SteelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  5. Crochet v. DugasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. RenaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. State Ex Rel. Castille v. CookeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API