Snoozie Shavings, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
The instant appeal presents the single question of whether the appellant-taxpayer has the right to maintain an action for a refund without having first made full payment of the tax liability. The trial court answered the question negatively, sustaining respondent State Board of Equalization’s demurrer without leave to amend.
The factual background shows that appellant, a California corporation with principal offices in Crescent City, California, incurred a use tax liability in the amount of $28,342.08 plus interest for certain personal property purchased outside the state but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Springer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Sherman v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Honeywell, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985