Legal Opinion

Mills v. Brunetto

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 10, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill is filed to foreclose a purchase-money mortgage. The defendants filed an answer setting up an encumbrance on the lands conveyed by the mortgage by reason of a violated building restriction, and a counter-claim alleging misrepresentation and fraud on the part of the complainant with respect to the encumbrance, thereby seeking an abatement in the amount due on the mortgage. At the hearing the charges of misrepresentation and fraud were withdrawn and abandoned.

The mortgaged premises were conveyed to the defendants by the complainant by deed dated November 20th, 1924, executed and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peabody Heights Co. v. WillsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  2. Wetmore v. . BruceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Batley v. FoerdererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Hawthorne v. OdensonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  5. Zelman v. KaufherrNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emery v. HansenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  2. Gravino v. GraliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API