Legal Opinion

First Fiduciary Corp. v. Commissioner of Banks

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 2, 1997No. 96-P-386PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

By complaint for declaratory judgment, First Fiduciary Corporation (First Fiduciary) sought a determination that the office of the Commissioner of Banks (OCB) lacked the authority it had asserted to regulate a corporate fiduciary that neither took deposits nor lent money. A judge of the Superior Court, proceeding on cross motions for summary judgment, ruled that First Fiduciary’s business was subject to regulation by OCB. We conclude that, because its activities are limited to corporate trusteeship and do not involve deposits, loans, or *458other areas of banking business, First Fiduciary is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Protective Life Insurance v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Town of Nantucket v. BeineckeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Green v. Board of Appeals of ProvincetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Commissioner of Revenue v. Marr Scaffolding Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Berenson v. National Financial Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  5. State v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API