Sial v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Appellant-petitioner Nausher Sial appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Specifically, Sial makes two arguments, one of which is dispositive: he alleges that the post-conviction court erred in finding that he did not receive the ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on his attorney’s failure to advise him that deportation was a possible consequence of a guilty plea. Finding that Sial’s attorney was ineffective for failing to advise his client of the penal consequences of pleading guilty, we reverse the judgment of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daryl O. McCleese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Pinkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Naveed Gulzar v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. Morones-QuinonezColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Alex Carrillo v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. TejeiroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Jose Carreno v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.