Legal Opinion

Sial v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2007No. 71A04-0609-PC-502PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

Appellant-petitioner Nausher Sial appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Specifically, Sial makes two arguments, one of which is dispositive: he alleges that the post-conviction court erred in finding that he did not receive the ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on his attorney’s failure to advise him that deportation was a possible consequence of a guilty plea. Finding that Sial’s attorney was ineffective for failing to advise his client of the penal consequences of pleading guilty, we reverse the judgment of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Daryl O. McCleese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Pinkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Naveed Gulzar v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. Morones-QuinonezColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Alex Carrillo v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. TejeiroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Jose Carreno v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API