Williams v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
We have held that where a single count of an indictment encompasses separate incidents on which a conviction could be based, the judge must instruct the jury that it has to reach unanimous agreement on at least one of the incidents in order to return a verdict of guilty. Appellant David Williams requested such a jury instruction in this case with respect to the charge that he had threatened to injure Rhea Shaw, his former girlfriend, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-1810 (2001). The judge’s denial of the requested unanimity instruction requires us to reverse appellant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- United States v. HurtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Klat, Susan ViolaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wynn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Snell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Marquet Bryant and Robert B. Hagood v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lopez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.