Legal Opinion

Williams v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 2009No. 04-CF-1169PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

We have held that where a single count of an indictment encompasses separate incidents on which a conviction could be based, the judge must instruct the jury that it has to reach unanimous agreement on at least one of the incidents in order to return a verdict of guilty. Appellant David Williams requested such a jury instruction in this case with respect to the charge that he had threatened to injure Rhea Shaw, his former girlfriend, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-1810 (2001). The judge’s denial of the requested unanimity instruction requires us to reverse appellant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Owens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. HurtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Klat, Susan ViolaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wynn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Snell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Marquet Bryant and Robert B. Hagood v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Lopez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API