State v. Byrd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
The defendants filed separate briefs, each of which raises three identical questions for the Court’s determination. They first assign error to the denial of their motions to dismiss the charges of involuntary manslaughter. If the State introduced substantial *627evidence that the defendants intentionally violated a statute designed for the protection of people and that violation proximately caused the death of Jo Von Cornelius Byrd, the defendants’ motions to dismiss were properly denied. See State v. Wilkerson, 295 N.C. 559, 247 S.E. 2d 905 (1978). We believe there is sufficient…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SalmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. HamrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983