Legal Opinion

Samuel v. Frohnmayer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1987No. 137346; CA A37404PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff is a chiropractor and, at all times relevant to this action, was president of the Oregon Association of Chiropractic Physicians (OACP). While serving in that capacity, he volunteered at the request of the medical director of the Workers’ Compensation Department (Department) to establish a peer review committee to review chiropractor billings to compensation insurance carriers. In this action, he seeks a judicial declaration that he is entitled under the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS 30.260 to 30.300, to be indemnified by the state for expenses incurred in defending a civil action…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cain v. RijkenOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kantola v. Lovell Auto Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Samuel v. FrohnmayerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Samuel v. FrohnmayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Samuel v. FrohnmayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. McKinley v. Owyhee Project North Board of ControlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Berry v. State, Department of General ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API