Legal Opinion

Nielson v. AT & T CORP.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSabers, Justice

[¶ 1.] Gregg Nielson, father, personal representative of the Estate of Karyn Nielson, and Judith Nielson, mother, (Niel-son) sued defendants alleging: 1) a claim for the wrongful death of their daughter, Karyn; 2) a survival claim on behalf of Karyn for the emotional fright and distress that she suffered in the moments before her death; and 3) a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress on behalf of Judith for witnessing Karyn’s death. The trial court granted summary judgment that Nielson’s claims were barred by South Dakota’s Equine Activities Act (SDCL Ch 42-11). We reverse and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gates v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Atlantic Coast Airlines v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Engler v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API