State v. Young
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The State filed a petition for intermediate appeal, granted by this Court, from a judgment holding that the double penalty provision provided by SDCL 32-22-56 does not apply to overweight axle violations. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] On March 2, 2000, Kenneth Young picked up a load of hay near Wor-land, Wyoming and was headed home to Wisconsin. He was driving his own semi-tractor pulling a new 1999 flatbed trailer. At Worland, his total truck weight was 73,560 pounds with each axle weighing less than 20,000 pounds, weighed on a certified elevator scale.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Meyerink v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between Groseth International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Therkildsen v. Fisher BeverageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KrahwinkelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Dejong v. DejongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.