Legal Opinion

State v. Young

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The State filed a petition for intermediate appeal, granted by this Court, from a judgment holding that the double penalty provision provided by SDCL 32-22-56 does not apply to overweight axle violations. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] On March 2, 2000, Kenneth Young picked up a load of hay near Wor-land, Wyoming and was headed home to Wisconsin. He was driving his own semi-tractor pulling a new 1999 flatbed trailer. At Worland, his total truck weight was 73,560 pounds with each axle weighing less than 20,000 pounds, weighed on a certified elevator scale.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Meyerink v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between Groseth International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Therkildsen v. Fisher BeverageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. KrahwinkelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Dejong v. DejongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API