Legal Opinion

Morris v. Ogden State Bank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1934No. 5187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, District Judge.

In this case the district court sustained joint and several demurrers, for want of facts, filed by the defendants, to the third amended complaint. The plaintiff elected to stand upon his pleading and appeals from the resulting judgment of dismissal. The question to be determined is whether the third amended complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendants. Since all of the wrongs complained of are alleged to have been committed in the furtherance of a conspiracy to which all of the defendants were parties, so that, if one is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Niles v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Bartlett v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Foote v. Utah Commercial & Savings BankUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hyams v. BambergerUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Thomas v. Ogden State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aurora Credit Services, Inc. v. Liberty West Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Richardson v. Arizona Fuels Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. DLB Collection Trust Ex Rel. Helgesen & Waterfall v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  4. Lochhead v. AlacanoDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1988
  5. ANR Ltd. Inc. v. ChattinDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API