Legal Opinion

Haber v. County of Nassau

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 9, 1976No. 73 C 1408PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, District Judge.

Defendants renew their motion made at the close of the proof on the entire case for a directed verdict and move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial (FRCP 50).

The Court reserved decision on defendants’ motion made at the end of the case and submitted the issues on the following three claims in plaintiff’s complaint, as amended, to the jury:

1. An alleged violation of plaintiff’s son, George Haber’s, civil rights by the defendant Sehlmeyer (on which the jury returned a verdict for said defendant).

2. Wrongful…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lowery v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. People v. DecinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Amaro v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. EckertNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henkel v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Griffin v. GehretCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API