Legal Opinion
Henkel v. Holm
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 25, 1987No. CO-87-412PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Appellant Kevin Henkel’s personal injury claim against respondent Kenneth Holm came to trial on January 27 and 28 of 1987. After the jury had begun deliberation on the matter, the trial court granted Holm’s earlier motion for a directed verdict. Regardless, the trial court still allowed the jury to present its verdict, in which it found Holm 50% liable. The trial court then issued its order for a directed verdict, contrary to the jury findings, and judgment was entered accordingly. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Kevin Henkel’s claim against respondent Kenneth Holm…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Olson v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Swagger v. City of CrystalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Schmanski v. Church of St. Casimir of WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Verla Loraine Tackett, Cross-Appellee v. Pearl Kidder, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Campbell v. Insurance Service AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Sheppard Ex Rel. Wilson v. Midway R-1 School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Charlotte J. Kraft v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Abbett v. County of St. LouisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.