Richmond v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentRobert M. Bell, Judge
In State v. Faulkner, 301 Md. 482, 483 A.2d 759 (1984), characterizing it as a “mitigation defense,” see Sims v. State, 319 Md. 540, 554, 573 A.2d 1317, 1323 (1990); Dykes v. State, 319 Md. 206, 216, 571 A.2d 1251, 1257 (1990), we recognized imperfect self-defense, 301 Md. at 484, 499-501, 483 A.2d at 760, 768-69, and applied it in a prosecution for the statutory offense of assault with intent to murder. Id. at 504-505, 483 A.2d at 771. We explained the latter holding: because the statute used the term “murder” in describing the crime, id. at 504, 483 A.2d at 771, but did not define or limit…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.