Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Greene

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 16, 1936No. 3364PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS,' Justice

(after stating the case as above).

Those assignments are overruled which question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings made by the jury.

The testimony of Mr. Cunningham, one of the attorneys for plaintiff, supports the finding as to the attorney’s fee.

The testimony of the plaintiff and the medical experts who testified in his behalf supports the other findings. To quote the testimony and discuss its probative force would serve no useful purpose.. Error is assigned to the refusal to submit requested issues which read:

“Question D: Do you find from a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Missouri State Life Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. DunkenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. People of Sioux County v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. CostTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Mayo v. Hartford Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  4. Russom v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1956
  5. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. v. GhioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API