Legal Opinion
In Re Chang
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 22, 1997No. 96-BG-1005PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
In its Report and Recommendation, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Daniel S. Chang, Esq., a member of the bar of this court, be suspended from practice for six months for commingling and unintentional misappropriation. Chang contends before this court that the recommended discipline is too harsh, and he urges the court to issue a suspension of thirty days, as recommended by the Hearing Committee.
Under the provisions of D.C. Bar. XI § 9(g) (1996), we are required to adopt the recommended disposition of the Board…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.