Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of Crown Point

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1896No. 17,904PublishedCited by 40 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

The question involved in this appeal is as to the power of incorporated towns to compel, by ordinance, a railroad company to keep a watchman *422and erect and maintain gates at points where the tracks cross a street, and impose penalties for the failure so to do.

It is the law in this jurisdiction that municipal corporations possess and can exercise such powers only as are granted by the legislature in express words and those necessarily or fairly implied or incident to the powers expressly granted, and those essential to the declared objects and purposes of the corporation.

No incidental powers…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burg v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. City of Chicago v. RumpffIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Evison v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. City of St. Paul v. ColterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
  5. Champer v. City of GreencastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. City of Logansport v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Shea v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Voss v. Waterloo Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Muncie Natural Gas Co. v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API