Legal Opinion

Marriage of Juelfs v. Juelfs

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1984No. C3-84-1152PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Father appeals from the trial court’s denial of his post-decree motions to forgive child support arrearages, reduce child support, and reopen the dissolution property division based on taxes assessed by Internal Revenue Service. Mother appeals from the denial of her attorney’s fees and appeals the adequacy of the medical insur- anee coverage obtained by father. We affirm and remand in part.

FACTS

The marriage of David and Constance Juelfs was dissolved on May 19, 1983. The parties have two minor children, ages 12 and 7 at the time of dissolution.

Father had been employed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Solon v. SolonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Marriage of Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Giesner v. GiesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Marriage of Halverson v. HalversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Goff v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Robertson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Marriage of Halverson v. HalversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API