Marriage of Goff v. Goff
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Appellant Thomas Goff appeals the denial of his motion to reduce child support and to forgive arrearages. The trial court found that appellant did not make a sufficient showing of changed financial circumstances to justify a reduction. The trial court refused to forgive arrearages because it found that appellant did not make a good faith effort to keep his former employment or to find equivalent employment. The court also awarded respondent $500 attorney fees. We affirm.
FACTS
The parties’ seven year marriage was dissolved in 1982. Respondent was granted legal and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Marriage of Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Deliduka v. DelidukaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Giesner v. GiesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Meisner v. MeisnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002