Los Angeles Railway Co. v. Davis
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to quiet title to certain land. Defendants demurred to the complaint upon the general ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action—no other ground of demurrer being stated. The demurrer was overruled. Defendants then answered, denying plaintiff’s title to the land, and setting up title in themselves. The court found for the plaintiff and rendered judgment accordingly. Defendants appealed from the judgment upon the judgment-roll.
The only point made by appellants for a reversal is, that the complaint does not contain an averment that plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- The Phoenix Bank v. . DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Loup v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- MacLeod v. StelleIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Craig v. San Fernando Furniture Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Redding Gold & Copper Mining Co. v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- Winnebago State Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.