Legal Opinion

People v. Hartkemeyer

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1992No. 91CA0304PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MARQUEZ.

Defendant, Daniel R. Hartkemeyer, appeals the order of the trial court denying his Crim.P. 35(c) motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Defendant entered a plea of guilty to a charge of conspiracy to sell or distribute marihuana. Originally sentenced to probation, defendant was resentenced to four years incarceration following revocation of his probation. Subsequently, he filed a motion for post-conviction relief, alleging that his sentence was illegal as he was entitled to the benefit of amendatory legislation which lowered the classification of his offense. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. Denver District Court, Division 12Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. People v. SimonsColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. RussellColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. DiGuglielmoColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. People v. LopezColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. KilgoreColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. CorichiColorado Court of Appeals · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API