Legal Opinion

Rushing v. City of Springfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 2006No. 26776PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

Gary W. Rushing and Dixie Rushing (collectively referred to as plaintiffs) appeal a judgment for the City of Springfield, Missouri, (defendant) in a case plaintiffs brought seeking damages resulting from suspension of disability pension benefits to Gary Rushing by the board of trustees of the Policeman’s and Fireman’s Retirement Fund. Gary Rushing had been injured in the course of his employment as a fireman for the City of Springfield. He had received disability benefits since November 1992. His disability benefits were suspended in January 1997 for failure to submit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wipfler v. BaslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Sullivan v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Bydalek v. BrinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Geiler v. BoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. In the Interest of D.L.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Atkins v. McPhetridgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Rogers v. Hester Ex Rel. MillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Pattie v. French Quarter ResortsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Wheelhouse Marina Real Estate, L.L.C. v. BommaritoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Yates v. Briggs & StrattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API