Geiler v. Boyer

SHANGLER, Chief Judge.

The merits of this appeal, if reached, involve allegations of error that the $6,000 personal injury verdict for plaintiff was excessive and required remittitur, and that the causation between the accident and injury was not shown by competent medical evidence. We dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Civil Rule 84.04(c), (h), V.A.M.R. and do not reach the merits.

At the trial, the dispute was not as to defendant’s liability, but whether plaintiff’s low back strain was to be attributed to pre-existing spondylolisthesis or was, in fact, an aggravation of that…