Legal Opinion
Citizens' National Bank v. Wiswell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 30, 1923No. 11016PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This appeal involves the validity of the summons and return thereof. The plaintiff in error presents the general question under three propositions as follows:
- “First. Whether or not (he priginal summons prior to amendment was valid and good;
“Second. Whether or not the court erred in permitting the plaintiff to amend the return of the officer over the officer’s objection, and
“Third. Whether or not the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to quash the summons as amended.”
The style and number of the case is as follows:
“H. Wiswell, Plaintiff,
“vs. No. 2286.
“The Citizens National Bank.
“…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Great Northern Hotel Co. v. Farrand & Votey Organ Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Harvester Co. v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Bell Storage Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Chaney v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Peterman v. RothschildSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Exchange Nat. Bank of Tulsa v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.