Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Peterman v. Rothschild

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 10, 1924No. 13508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, G.

The action was one in replevin. The plaintiff in error was defendant and defendants in error were plaintiffs in the trial court and will be referred-to in this opinion as they were there. Plaintiffs brought their action against the defendant to recover possession of a Maxwell touring1 ear, claiming the right of possession under the terms and conditions of a certain mortgage made' and executed by one George W. Wilson to Pier-son Automobile Company on May 22, 1920. and assigned to the National Bond & Investment Company (not inc.) of Chicago, being the firm name of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Motsenbocker v. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Bankers' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Elwood Oil & Gas Co. v. GanoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allied Reserve Life Insurance Co. of Oklahoma City v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API