Legal Opinion

Tamashiro v. Control Specialist, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2001No. 22569PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RAMIL, J.

Petitioner/cross-respondent-appellant Neal M. Tamashiro and respondent/cross-petitioner-appellees Control Specialist, Inc. and TIG Insurance Company, Inc. (together Employer) timely applied to this court to review the decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) in Tamashiro v. Control Specialists, Inc., 97 Haw. 94, 34 P.3d 24 (Haw.Ct.App. 2001). In its published opinion, the ICA held: (1) that the Employer adduced substantial evidence so as to rebut the presumption, under HRS § 386-85(1) (1993), that Tamashiro was temporarily and totally disabled (TTD)…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Konno v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Chung v. Animal Clinic, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Furuya v. Association of Apartment Owners of Pacific Monarch, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Miyamoto v. Wahiawa General HospitalHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In re the Ishida-Waiakamilo Legacy TrustHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. CHAY v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Caberto v. Maui Electric CompanyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API