Legal Opinion

State v. Joyce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 1981No. 80-1607, CA 19919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction of manufacture of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charge based on a variety of statutory and constitutional arguments. We affirm.

Defendant was alleged to be growing marijuana. He was charged with manufacture of a Schedule I controlled substance, a Class A felony. ORS 475.992(l)(a). The gist of defendant’s argument is that, under Oregon law, marijuana is not a Schedule I controlled substance. He argues that no schedules of controlled substances are in force, or alternatively that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. KerfootCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API