State v. Joyce
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Defendant appeals his conviction of manufacture of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charge based on a variety of statutory and constitutional arguments. We affirm.
Defendant was alleged to be growing marijuana. He was charged with manufacture of a Schedule I controlled substance, a Class A felony. ORS 475.992(l)(a). The gist of defendant’s argument is that, under Oregon law, marijuana is not a Schedule I controlled substance. He argues that no schedules of controlled substances are in force, or alternatively that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. DinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. KerfootCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960