Legal Opinion

Rowell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1993No. CR-90-1669PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After Remand from Alabama Supreme Court

The Alabama Supreme Court remanded this cause for this Court to consider the merits of Manuel Dee Rowell's argument that the trial judge erroneously admitted evidence of a telephone pager found on his person and $800 in cash found in a work boot in the trunk of an automobile that the appellant owned jointly with Shawn Gray in his trial for possession of a controlled substance, in violation of § 13A-12-212(a)(1), Codeof Alabama 1975, Ex parte Rowell, 666 So.2d 823 (Ala. 1992). The appellant argues that the trial court committed reversible error in denying…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Temple v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Donahoo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Radke v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Ex Parte StorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Radke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. William Joyce v. Federated National Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. Bright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Rowell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Bright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Rowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API