Legal Opinion

William Joyce v. Federated National Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 19, 2017No. SC16-103PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPariente, J.

The issue in this case is whether trial courts may apply a contingency fee multiplier to an award of attorney’s fees to a prevailing party only in “rare” and “exceptional” circumstances, as the Fifth District Court of Appeal held in Federated National Insurance Co. v. Joyce, 179 So.3d 492 (Fla. 6th DCA 2015). Petitioners, the insureds in a successful dispute with their homeowners’ insurance earner, assert that the Fifth District’s opinion misapplied our precedent from Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 1985), and its progeny. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Adkins v. CollensAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Citizens Property Ins. Corp. v. LaguerreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Pazmino v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Alan Kent Little v. Bath & Kitchen Boutique, LLC, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  5. Atm Shafiqul Khalid And Xencare Software, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API