Nelson v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
The third amended complaint alleges that plaintiff is assignee of a claim of Sonelco, a corporation, against defendants; that defendants assigned to Sonelco an account with Hansen; and that, notwithstanding the assignment of the account, defendants collected moneys from Hansen and kept them for themselves, with a balance of $3,143.49 due from defendants to plaintiff as assignee.
Defendant Charles Nelson moved to file a cross-complaint with the following allegations: That he and his son were partners and organized the Sonelco corporation to con tinue the partnership business; that it was agreed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Thorpe v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Elam v. ArzagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schweiger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- California Casualty General Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Landis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Daum v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.