Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1950No. Civ. 17690PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

The third amended complaint alleges that plaintiff is assignee of a claim of Sonelco, a corporation, against defendants; that defendants assigned to Sonelco an account with Hansen; and that, notwithstanding the assignment of the account, defendants collected moneys from Hansen and kept them for themselves, with a balance of $3,143.49 due from defendants to plaintiff as assignee.

Defendant Charles Nelson moved to file a cross-complaint with the following allegations: That he and his son were partners and organized the Sonelco corporation to con tinue the partnership business; that it was agreed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Thorpe v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Elam v. ArzagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. California Casualty General Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Landis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Daum v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API