Legal Opinion
Crosby v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 1, 1985No. A8210-06682, CA A32642PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Plaintiff suffered an on-the-job injury while he was employed by defendant W. G. Moe & Sons, Inc., and, as a result, he was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits from defendant SAIF. Plaintiff alleges that
“* * * representatives of the two defendants met and agreed that defendant Moe would create a light duty job for the plaintiff so that workers’ compensation benefits would no longer be payable to the plaintiff. The defendants further agreed that after the plaintiff commenced his light duty job he would be discharged from his employment.”
Plaintiff pleaded three claims: first, that both…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kim Clay Oviatt, by and Through His Conservator, Sr. Maria Francis Waugh v. Fred Pearce, Sheriff Multnomah County, Kim Clay Oviatt, by and Through His Conservator, Sr. Maria Francis Waugh v. Fred Pearce, Sheriff Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Falline v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Oviatt ex rel. Waugh v. PearceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Richardson v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Schoen v. FREIGHTLINER LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.