Legal Opinion
Matter of One Cessna 206 Aircraft, Etc.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1978No. 13175PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
Richard C. Saathoff appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motions to intervene and to set aside a default judgment forfeiting an airplane to the State because of the use of the airplane in the transportation of narcotics in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1041. We take jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
On 9 May 1975, one Cessna 206 aircraft was seized by authorities of the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) following a two month surveillance. The aircraft was allegedly used to smuggle marijuana into the United States from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Pellegrino v. NesbitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- The Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association) v. Corporacion Hotelera De Puerto Rico, Municipality of San Juan, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Napolitano v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Weaver v. Synthes, Ltd.(USA)Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. One 1979 Pontiac FirebirdCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. BallingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.