Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Newton v. Altheimer

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

These proceedings, brought here by separate appeals, were instituted in the circuit court of Pulaski County by the 'commissioners of certain road improvement -districts to compel the county court, by peremptory mandamus, to apportion to each of said districts its alleged share of road funds as prescribed by special statute enacted by the General Assembly of 1923. Special Acts 1923, p. 370. The cases have been consolidated here for hearing and decision. One of the cases (Newton v. Altheimer) was formerly here on appeal under' the style of Moyer v. Altheimer, and the judgment of the circuit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Warner Valley Stock Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Irwin v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Richardson v. McChesneySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. United States Ex Rel. Bernardin v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Phillips v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Prewett v. Waterworks Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Barney v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Coleman v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Shackleford v. Arkansas Baptist CollegeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API