Doran v. Del Taco, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES
TAYLOR, District Judge.
Synthesizing current authorities, the Court holds it is a proper exercise of discretion to require a pre-litigation unambiguous warning notice to the defendant and a reasonable opportunity to cure the violation as a prerequisite to recovering attorneys’ fees under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act or similar state statutes.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Jerry Doran is a paraplegic who requires a wheelchair and a mobility-equipped vehicle to travel in public. Plaintiff visited Defendants’ Del Taco restaurant in Costa Mesa, California, where he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Botosan v. Paul McNally RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Victor Barrios v. California Interscholastic Federation California Interscholastic Federation Opinion Southern SectionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- McInnis-Misenor v. Maine Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Skaff v. Meridien North America Beverly Hills, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Vasquez v. CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Harris v. Stonecrest Care Auto Center, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Gunther v. LinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Gaylor v. Greenbriar of Dahlonega Shopping Center, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.