Legal Opinion
Miller v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 9, 1915No. 5911PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error from District Court, Muskogee County; R. P. De Graffenried, Judge. Action by L. Miller against the Connecticut Fire Insurance Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
From a judgment of the district court of Muskogee county sustaining a demurrer to his petition, L. Miller, plaintiff in error, brings the case here. The petition discloses that on October 23, ,1911, plaintiff sued defendant, Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, on its standard policy insuring certain of his property against loss by fire between noon of May 11, 1910, and noon of May 11, 1911—
“while located and contained as described herein and not elsewhere, to wit: * * * $- on two-story concrete building * * * situated in Tahlequah, Oklahoma, being [on] lots Nos. 2 and 3 and 4, block 41. * * *…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Germania Fire Ins. Co. v. BarringerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Firemen's Fund Ins. Co. v. BoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- American Cent. Ins. Co. v. BoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. CorrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932