Legal Opinion
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 12, 1926No. 17005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
This appeal is from a judgment on a fire insurance policy. The first ground relied on for reversal is that the court erred in overruling a general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition.
The property insured and alleged to have been destroyed by fire was a barn and sheds attached located on the east half of the southeast 'quarter, section 9, township 11, range 26, Roger Mills county, insured for $800, and grain and seeds while in dwelling, granaries, barns and cribs, insured for $200.
The contention is that the allegations of the petition are insufficient to show an insurable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nance v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Merchants' Planters' Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Mountain Park Stock Farm Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. MittendorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Germania Fire Ins. Co. v. BarringerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. of Dallas v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Continental Insurance v. PortwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Aetna Ins. v. RallsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. CorrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.