Legal Opinion
State v. Haugen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 30, 2015No. 10CR0636; A151535PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of one count of third-degree assault, ORS 163.165. On appeal, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his (1) motion to suppress the victim’s eyewitness identification; and (2) motions in limine to exclude evidence that the state introduced to show that defendant was motivated to commit the assault by his membership in a motorcycle gang. We conclude that the trial court did not err, and we affirm the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
The victim went to a bar in Grants Pass. When he arrived, he observed approximately six people whom he believed,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BaughmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. DavisClackamas County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.