State v. Harrell

*349Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for reckless driving, ORS 811.140, challenging the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress a witness's out-of-court identification *820and any in-court identification of defendant. He argues that the court should have excluded the identification evidence because it did not meet the foundational threshold for admissibility under OEC 602 and OEC 701, as it was unreliable and the conditions under which the police officers administered a "showup" were inherently suggestive. Further, he argues that, even if the identification evidence did meet that…