Legal Opinion

Whaley v. Wynn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 26, 1922No. 6 Div. 507PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

In this action—unlawful detainer—the question is merely as to the right of possession between the parties to the record, regardless of whether the plaintiff, or the defendant, or a third person, has the superior claim to the ownership of the property. Nicrosi v. Phillipi, 91 Ala. 299, 8 South. 561.

The general rule is that the plaintiff must show prior possession in himself, but this means only a possession prior to the inception of the wrongful possession of the defendant—i. e., prior to the beginning of the unlawful detainer. And, “so long as the tenant holds under his lease, his actual…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nicrosi v. PhillipiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Beck v. GlennSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Barnewell v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Cooper v. GambillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Gambill v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tarrant American Savings Bank v. Smokeless Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Riley v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Koehne v. HarveyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Walker v. AdlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API