Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Parker
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The submission in this case was upon a motion to strike the bill of exceptions and on the merits.
We have examined the transcript and hold there wasi no violation of the rule in the preparation of the bill of exceptions. Woodward Iron Co. v. Herndon, Adm’r, 130 Ala. 364, 375, 376, 30 So. 370; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al. v. Hall, 131 Ala. 161, 32 So. 603; Long v. Seigel, 177 Ala. 338, 58 So. 380; Factors & Mill End Distributors, Inc., v. Rosenthal, 229 Ala. 644, 159 So. 72.
The motion to strike the bill of exceptions is denied.
The facts, briefly stated, are: That…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sexton v. Chicago Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Kelly v. HanwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Dunlap v. BullardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Long v. SeigelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alabama Butane Gas Co. v. Tarrant Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Houston v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- In Re Farley Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- John Hilsman Investments, LLC v. Quality Properties, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013