Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Lowe

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 30, 1981No. Civ. A. H-79-1268PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CIRE, District Judge.

This case arises under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(b), which permits any participant in an ERISA plan, 29 U.S.C. § Í002(2), to recover benefits wrongfully withheld or to clarify rights to future benefits.

Plaintiff is a former employee of M. David Lowe Personnel Services and is seeking to recover, pursuant to the terms of the M. David Lowe Group Employees Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (hereinafter the Plan), those benefits to which he believes he is entitled. His employment with M. David Lowe began in 1970 and terminated in March 1978; at the end of the plan…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winer v. Edison Bros. Stores Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  2. Amory v. Boyden Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Shaw v. KruidenierDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1979
  4. Parenti v. Wytmar & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Nedrow v. MacFarlane & Hays Co. Employees' Profit Sharing Plan & TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holliday v. Xerox Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  2. Watts v. Wikoff Color Corp. of SCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  3. Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. AinslieSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API