State v. Hill
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSherer, J.
The defendant was tried on three counts of forgery by the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County without a jury and found guilty by the court on two counts.
The only error assigned and argued in this court is that the court erred to the prejudice of the defendant (1) in admitting, over defendant’s objection, a written stipulation signed by the prosecution and the defendant, wherein it was agreed that defendant was to submit to a “lie detector test” and that the result was to be admitted in evidence, and (2) in permitting the operator of the machine to state his opinions as to the truthfulness…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- Louis Weinstock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- State v. BohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- State ex rel. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.