Davis v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentGlickstein, Judge
We are receding from Howard v. State, 458 So.2d 407 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), which interpreted Delap v. State, 440 So.2d 1242 (Fla.1983), saying:
We find no other error in the trial court, but mention the stipulation for the use of the polygraph examination for two reasons. First, we remind counsel that by stipulating to its use, the defendant waives the underlying objection to reliability, thus mooting reliability as an issue. See DeLap v. State, 440 So.2d 1242, 1247 (Fla.1983).
Id. at 408.1
DeLap, which Howard interpreted, reiterated that parties may stipulate to the admissibility of the results…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Commonwealth v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Pulakis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Delap v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.