Legal Opinion
Munning v. Gap, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 24, 2017No. Case No.16-cv-03804-TEHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
THELTON E. HENDERSON, United States District Judge
On January 9, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“Mot.”) (ECF No. 44). Plaintiff timely opposed the motion (“Opp’n”) (ECF No. 47) and Defendants timely replied (“Reply”) (ECF No. 48). The Court heard oral arguments on the motion on February 13, 2017. After carefully considering the parties’ written and oral arguments, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion for the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christa Robey and Maureen Reynolds v. SPARC Group, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2024
- Goldstein v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Murj, Inc. v. Rhythm Management Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Pennie Roper v. Big Heart Pet Brands, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020