Legal Opinion
Lozano v. Butte County
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 11, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01313Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAFAEL LOZANO, No. 2:22-cv-01313-TLN-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BUTTE COUNTY et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Butte County (the “County”), Butte County 18 Board of Supervisors, Butte County Department of Developmental Services, Paula Daneluk, Bill 19 Connelly, Steve Lambert, and Doug Teeter’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. 20 (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff Rafael Lozano (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition and Defendant filed a 21 reply. (ECF Nos. 13, 14.).…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.