Legal Opinion

Drolsum v. Luzuriaga

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 7, 1992No. 1174, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

This case concerns the parties’ rights and obligations with respect to an easement that crosses the appellants’ (the Drolsums) property. The case reaches this court after a series of proceedings that culminated in a trial, upon the conclusion of which the court issued a memorandum opinion and order in the appellees’ favor. This appeal ensued, and for the reasons articulated herein, we shall affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

In 1973, John Hannon purchased 617.744 acres of land lying on the northwest side of Arters Mill Road and on both sides…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tong v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Wagner v. DoehringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Barnard v. GaumerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Lindhorst v. WrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Legal Aid Bureau, Inc. v. Bishop's Garth Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beck v. MangelsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Kobrine, L.L.C. v. MetzgerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Buck Mountain Owners' Ass'n v. PrestwichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Shallow Run Ltd. Partnership v. State Highway AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API